I took my son to see the movie "The Hobbit" last night. I wasn't too impressed.
Here is the review I posted on my FB page and I am not even going to bother to reformat it for you (the imaginary reader) because I am lazy (and because you don't exist):
My review of the Hobbit: I didn't really like it.
It was far too long--each scene was drug out too long, the 48 fps thing was distracting (at best)
and weird, there was too much camera movement that I found dizzying and distracting (was
giving me vertigo in some places), and, the worst part was that I felt that I had already seen it
before---not that feeling you get when you have read the book--no, that feeling that they lifted
most of the scenes right out of LotR.
I woke up this morning even more annoyed---there wasn't even a "plot" in the true sense. The
whole thing felt like the world's longest, slowest introduction. Or a stupidly long movie trailer for
the next installment.
Here is the story in one sentence: 13 dwarves, 1 hobbit and a wizard set out on a trip and get into
some fights along the way.
No climax, no denouement, no purpose, no completion.
But 9 year old enjoyed all the fighting and says he really enjoyed the movie.
It was like the fanciest NZ tourism video ever made.
problem? I guess the formula for a good book isn't really the same as the formula for a good movie?
I guess I was disappointed because I found it too much like a mindless action flick. This was just one
fighting action sequence after another--in between lovely NZ scenery shots. But the way it was
portrayed, the story was sloooow and secondary to thefighting. Forced, it seemed (the story) or an
afterthought.
And yes, it was stretched too thin in many places. I have lots of anxiety so it is easy to trigger my
emotions in those "OMG will they survive?" moments but I really just felt... nothing. I wasn't too
invested in any of the characters tbh.
I expected so much more.
No comments:
Post a Comment